Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts

Sunday, September 29, 2013

David Gilmour's controversial remarks.

As stated by Katie J. M. Baker on Jezebel.com:


"If you're into books written by women (HAHAHAHAHAHAHA what's that) don't take University of Toronto professor David Gilmour's fiction class; he's "not interested" in teaching women authors (except Virginia Woolf, who somehow manages to entertain him). "What I teach is guys," he says. "Serious heterosexual guys." Got it.
Here's what Gilmour told Hazlitt re female writers, queer writers, and Chinese (?) writers:
I’m not interested in teaching books by women. Virginia Woolf is the only writer that interests me as a woman writer, so I do teach one of her short stories. But once again, when I was given this job I said I would only teach the people that I truly, truly love. Unfortunately, none of those happen to be Chinese, or women. Except for Virginia Woolf. And when I tried to teach Virginia Woolf, she’s too sophisticated, even for a third-year class. Usually at the beginning of the semester a hand shoots up and someone asks why there aren’t any women writers in the course. I say I don’t love women writers enough to teach them, if you want women writers go down the hall. What I teach is guys. Serious heterosexual guys. F. Scott Fitzgerald, Chekhov, Tolstoy. Real guy-guys. Henry Miller. Philip Roth."
Some have defended him, whilst others are outraged. He himself has since backed off and apologized for those comments.

Now, here's what I think: David Gilmour's situation is an example of many things, not the lest of which is that you can never be too careful nowadays in making 'absolute statements'. As an English litt student myself, I of course prefer a passionate teacher vs a dispassionate teacher; that being said, we can't only and always do what we love. If he only wanted to teach male writers, then let that course be entitled as such. As it is, it's dishonest to his students to teach an English literature class; he robs and denies them of an all-emcopassing view of that Literature (it wasn't only written by "Serious heterosexual guys"). "There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than can be dreamt of in your philosophy".








Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Has Canada become G.W. Buch-era U.S.?: "Tories axe gun show laws"


Tories axe gun show laws

OTTAWA – The Conservative government has repealed gun show regulations, on the advice of the same controversial advisory committee the prime minister recently distanced himself from.

Meanwhile, Ontario’s chief firearms officer says he fears the decision will eventually bring American-style gun-show problems to Canada.

The changes kill a set of rules that were introduced by the Liberals in 1998, but never brought into force after years of consultations and deferrals.

The regulations would have required the sponsor of a gun show to notify local police and the chief firearms officer of the province before an event, and to ensure the security and safety of the location and the firearms.

The government says it consulted Public Safety Minister Vic Toews’ Canadian Firearms Advisory Committee, which felt that gun owners already abided by a set of existing rules.

The decision was published Wednesday in the Canada Gazette, but did not appear on Public Safety Canada’s website. It notes that MPs and senators were given 30 days to request changes to the repeal, but neither House did.

“Canada has a strong gun control system and we will not weaken these protections,” said Julie Carmichael, a spokeswoman for Public Safety Minister Vic Toews.

“The purchase, transport and storage of firearms continues to be strictly controlled in Canada and these strict rules apply to gun shows. Our government has taken concrete action to strengthen our laws and to stop violent crime and illegal firearms.”

But earlier this month, Prime Minister Stephen Harper candidly rejected some of the committee’s recommendations to loosen other gun laws.

The Coalition for Gun Control has criticized the advisory committee for being stacked with gun enthusiasts including firearms dealers and representatives of the Canadian Sport Shooting Association. The Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police has been unable to get on the committee.

Committee member Greg Farrant, of the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters, says under the Liberals the same group was stacked in the other direction — with gun opponents.

He says that two police officers among the current group provide balance and valuable front-line viewpoints.
“There’s not always unanimity on the committee,” Farrant notes.

“There are varying degrees of support for certain measures, there are things that are discussed by the committee and put forward to the government for consideration.”

Chief Firearms Officers in the provinces had told the government that they wanted the regulations to come into force, particularly in light of the fact the gun registry was being shut down.

The registry made it necessary for long-gun transactions to be cleared first — the registrar had to verify the license of the purchaser and then issue a new registration in that person’s name.

Ontario’s Chief Firearms Officer Chris Wyatt said there is now no official way to ensure sellers are verifying licenses, and nothing on the books that requires a gun show sponsor to tell police an event is being held.
Wyatt says there are genuine concerns about theft and illegal sales at gun shows.

“Gun shows are a major source of illegal firearms in the United States, and that could happen here. That’s why we thought there should be greater regulation of gun shows now that the registry is gone,” said Wyatt.

“Some of these gun shows, they have hundreds of vendors and thousands of firearms. It might be an attractive target for criminals to steal firearms or acquire firearms. With long guns, the standard is now very low for accountability.”

Canada’s National Firearms Association hailed the decision Wednesday.

“In short, the Conservative government recognized that the gun show regulations were an unnecessary part of an ideological liberal agenda to gradually eliminate firearms ownership and cleared out this ill-intentioned piece of legislation for which there was no justifiable need,” said Sheldon Clare, president of the association.

- Jennifer Ditchburn, The Canadian Press/Metro

Sunday, February 26, 2012

Hey kids! Reform now or pay in pension later

New rules will protect sled dogs after 2010 massacre

Canada more right-leaning than before: poll


"Survey results indicate more Canadians see the country as having become more right-leaning over the last 10 years than think it has moved left, even as a majority are in favour of the federal government playing a role in redistributing wealth.
Results of an Angus Reid Public Opinion poll conducted for Montreal magazine L’Actualite, showed 37 per cent of respondents feel the values of the country have become more right-wing over the last decade. Just 15 per cent said the country has become more left-wing, 22 per cent said it was unchanged, while 26 per cent weren’t sure.
Looking at the current federal government, one might think Canadians are more right-leaning, have recently elected a majority Conservative government led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper. That’s in contrast to Jean Chretien’s majority Liberal governments that dominated Ottawa for most of the 1990s and the early part of the last decade.
“(The Harper government) has said as much, that they feel that Canada had moved to the right, and you can see that a lot of Canadians feel that way,” said Jaideep Mukerji, vice-president of Angus Reid Public Opinion.
“There’s probably some division among Canadians whether that is a good thing or a bad thing,” he added.
Respondents in Quebec and British Columbia were most likely to perceive a shift to the right in the country’s values, with 40 per cent of respondents in those provinces answering this way. The proportions feeling this way in other regions were 37 per cent in Atlantic Canada, 34 per cent in Ontario, 33 per cent in Saskatchewan and Manitoba which were polled together, and 35 per cent in Alberta.
And 56 cent of respondents agreed that the federal government has “an important role” in redistributing wealth and intervening in the economy “even if it means increasing taxes.” On the other hand, 36 per cent disagreed, while eight per cent were unsure.
Support for federal government economic intervention was strongest in Ontario at 62 per cent and lowest in Alberta at 44 per cent. In the Atlantic, 55 per cent supported this kind of government involvement; it was 52 per cent in Quebec; 55 per cent in Saskatchewan and Manitoba; and 55 per cent in B.C.
Asked if he saw anything contradictory about these results and the view many hold that the country has become more right-leaning, Mukerji said: “Not necessarily. I think it means that Canadians can appreciate that a country can move to the right and they can still hold views that may not be pure conservative views.”
There were some notable differences between men’s and women’s responses in the survey. For instance, 48 per cent of men indicated the country had become more right-wing in the last 10 years, compared to 26 per cent of women. There were similar proportions — 16 per cent of men and 15 per cent of women — who said Canada had become more left-wing. However, 38 per cent of women said they were not sure on this question compared to just 14 per cent of men.
On federal government intervention in the economy, 60 per cent of men were in favour compared to 53 per cent of women. On this question, 12 per cent of females said they were unsure compared to three per cent of men.
“Men are just much less likely to say they’re not sure about something,” Mukerji said. “They’re likely to just say they have an opinion on something, whereas women, I think, are a little more reflective on some of these issues.”
The results were based on online survey of 1,006 Canadian adults and were conducted between Jan. 6 and 8. Angus Reid said the results are representative of the population within 3.1 percentage points, 19 times out of 20." - Derek Abma, The Vancouver Sun.

Canadians expect to work well past traditional retirement age

Edmonton and Calgary in Alberta's cyber-crime top 10

Thursday, February 23, 2012

'Charges must be laid': NDP outrage over allegations that illegal election ‘robocalls’ linked to Tories


"The NDP has demanded a criminal investigation into links between the Conservatives and an Edmonton voice-broadcast company traced to fraudulent phone calls made during the federal election campaign.
The misleading pre-recorded calls received in Guelph, Ont., claimed they were from Elections Canada and told voters their polling stations had moved to a busy shopping mall in the city’s downtown.
Elections Canada, which made the connection, is now probing the deceptive “robocalls,” aided by the RCMP, while the Conservatives are conducting an internal probe. A party lawyer is interviewing campaign workers to find who was behind the “robocalls.”
The agency launched its investigation after it was inundated with complaints about election day calls in Guelph, Ont., one of 18 ridings across the country where voters were targeted by harassing or deceptive phone messages in an apparent effort to discourage Liberal supporters from voting.
In Guelph, a riding the Conservatives hoped to take from the Liberals, voters received recorded calls pretending to be from Elections Canada, telling them their polling stations had been moved. The calls led to a chaotic scene at one polling station, and likely led some voters to give up on voting.
Postmedia News and the Ottawa Citizen have found that Elections Canada traced the calls to Racknine Inc., a small Edmonton call centre that worked for the party’s national campaign and those of at least nine Conservative candidates, including Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s own campaign in Calgary Southwest. There is no evidence that Harper’s campaign or any of the other candidates were involved in the calls.
Opposition MPs have expressed suspicion, saying the Tories benefited from what appears to be a coordinated effort to discourage Liberal or NDP supporters from getting to the ballot box.
Comparing the practice to “goons with clubs,” outspoken NDP MP Pat Martin called the phone calls a heinous crime and demanded that charges be laid.
“How is this different from a bunch of goons with clubs blocking the door to a voter station as we’ve seen in third world countries or the deep south of the United States? Because the net effect is the same,” the MP for Winnipeg Centre said.
Liberal MP John McCallum said his party doesn’t have a “smoking gun pointing at Stephen Harper” but he encouraged the Conservatives to co-operate with the investigation.
“I want them to indicate they are cooperating fully in the investigation by Elections Canada, that they are revealing all information they are required to reveal and that they are not going to take this to court,” McCallum said.
Transcript of a bogus call sent to a voter in Guelph on federal election day, May 2, 2011.
“This is an automated message from Elections Canada. Due to a projected increase in voter turnout, your poll location has been changed. Your new voting location is at the Old Quebec Street Mall, at 55 Wyndham Street North. Once again, your new poll location is at the Old Quebec Street Mall, at 55 Wyndham Street North. If you have any questions, please call our hotline at 1-800-443-4456. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. (French version recorded in another woman’s voice follows.)”
The Conservative party issued a statement Thursday denying it was behind the calls: “The Conservative Party of Canada ran a clean and ethical campaign and would never tolerate such activity,” said the statement attributed to Jenni Byrne, who managed the Tories’ national campaign.
“The party was not involved with these calls and if anyone on a local campaign was involved they will not play a role in a future campaign.”
The statement said the party does not engage in voter suppression. Although the statement makes no mention of this, Postmedia News has learned that the party’s lawyer, Arthur Hamilton, is conducting an internal investigation into the calls.
NDP interim leader Nycole Turmel issued a letter the party sent to Commissioner of Canada Elections William Corbett, asking him to investigate fully.
But an Elections Canada investigation has been underway since immediately after the May 2 vote.
Racknine says it was unaware its servers were being used for the fake calls.
Fred DeLorey, a spokesman for the Conservative Party, declined to say how much business the party did with Racknine during the campaign. He said the party does not know who was behind the calls, and he did not respond to a question about its internal investigation.
Elections Canada came to Racknine after an elaborate digital chase that began with a single telephone number that showed up on call displays. Investigators traced it to a disposable “burner” cellphone registered in area code 450, in the city of Joliette, northeast of Montreal.
Using telephone billing records and Racknine server logs, Elections Canada investigators identified the Racknine account holder who sent out the calls.
Matt Meier, owner of Racknine, said he was unaware one of his customers was involved in the calls until contacted by Elections Canada in November.
“We couldn’t possibly have known that it was Racknine that was the initiator of the fake calls,” he said. “I had no idea what the content of the calls were.”
The company does not monitor outgoing calls made by customers through the automated service, Meier said. He estimates 10 million or more phone calls from about 200 accounts went out during the campaign.
Meier and his company are co-operating fully with the probe, he said.
He said he knows whose account was used for the calls, but could not reveal the owner, because of client confidentiality and concerns about interfering with the investigation. He said it was someone “down East” — meaning Ontario or Quebec.
The RCMP’s role in the investigation is unclear but it appears the force is assisting Elections Canada. RCMP officers have approached the Conservative Party, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The robocalls received in Guelph were recorded in female voices in both French and English. They told voters their polling stations had moved to a shopping mall in the city’s downtown, where parking was scarce.
Citizen-Postmedia investigation has found calls misdirecting voters were also reported in ridings across the country: Kitchener-Waterloo, Kitchener-Conestaga, London-West, Parkdale-High Park, Winnipeg South Centre and Sydney-Victoria. It is possible that they were caused by robo-dialing errors.
Liberal supporters in a dozen ridings, mostly in Ontario, reported mysterious harassing calls, often late in the evening or early in the morning, where rude callers from a phone bank pretended to be working for the Liberals. The calls seem to have been an attempt to alienate Liberal voters in ridings where the Liberals and Conservatives seemed to be in close contests.
The continuing Elections Canada probe is led by former RCMP fraud investigator Al Mathews, who previously worked on investigations of former Privacy Commissioner George Radwanski and former prime minister Brian Mulroney in the Airbus affair.
The Conservatives’ internal investigation is being conducted by Arthur Hamilton, who has been the party’s lead lawyer for years, making representations to the Gomery Commission and investigating MP Helena Guergis and Rahim Jaffer for the party in the “busty hookers” saga.
Hamilton did not respond to a request for comment, but sources say he is interviewing people who worked on the Conservative campaign.
“It seems [investigators] have identified somebody who did it, knowingly,” said one Conservative who spoke on condition of anonymity.
In addition to Racknine’s work for Alberta Conservative candidates in the federal election, Meier also has been involved with the provincial Wildrose Party in Alberta. Racknine’s voice-broadcasting service, marketed as [external] 2call.ca, hosted a hospitality suite at the most recent Conservative convention in Ottawa in June.
Meier says the firm is non-partisan and is trying to help Elections Canada.
“What I provided to Elections Canada was comprehensive,” he said in an interview this week. “They know everything. They have every single message recorded by the individuals who did this. That’s something I hope will assist them greatly in determining who made these calls.”
He realized his firm was linked to the deceptive calls only when Mathews showed up unannounced at his company’s office on 50th Street in Edmonton last November, armed with an order to produce records.
‘At first, I thought. “Oh, that’s strange,” Upon reflection, I thought, “This can’t be right. Why on Earth would it change on the day election?”’
— Sue Campbell, who had just returned home after voting on the morning of election day when a call came in saying her polling station had been moved
Elections Canada spokesman John Enright said the commissioner does not comment on ongoing investigations but confirmed an investigation into “some complaints regarding unsolicited telephone calls in which a violation of the (Elections) Act may have occurred.”
Mathews has travelled to Guelph to interview people who received the calls on election day, including United Church minister Sue Campbell, who is the wife of Green Party candidate John Lawson.
Campbell had just returned home after voting on the morning of election day when a call came in saying her polling station had been moved to the Quebec Street Mall in downtown Guelph.
“At first, I thought. ‘Oh, that’s strange,’” Campbell recalls. “Upon reflection, I thought, ‘This can’t be right. Why on Earth would it change on the day election?’”
She wrote down the digits on the caller ID — the number in Quebec — and called Elections Canada to complain.
Internal Elections Canada emails obtained under Access to Information legislation show officials were rattled by the calls.
At 11:06 a.m., election officer Anita Hawdur sent an email to to legal counsel Karen McNeil with the header: “URGENT Conservative campaign office communications with electors.” Hawdur reported that returning officers were calling to ask about the calls. McNeil responded by asking Hawdur to alert Rennie Molnar, the deputy chief electoral officer. He later emailed Michel Roussel, a senior director: “This one is far more serious. They have actually disrupted the voting process.”
Around the same time, Guelph Liberal MP Frank Valeriote got a call at his home, telling him that his campaign staff was hearing from Liberal supporters in the riding about the same kind of bogus Elections Canada calls.
What they first thought were a few nuisance calls, the Valeriote campaign recognized was an orchestrated campaign to discourage his supporters from voting.
Voters who ended up in the wrong place and were turned away were unlikely to persist and go to another polling station. A campaign worker was quickly dispatched to the mall, armed with a binder of polling maps, so he could redirect supporters back to the right place. Within an hour, more than 100 voters had turned up at the mall.
The phoney calls also were causing headaches for campaign staff working for Conservative candidate Marty Burke’s campaign. Radio stations were passing on a warning from Elections Canada about the erroneous messages.
Long-distance phone bills obtained by the Citizen and Postmedia show that the Guelph campaign called Matt Meier’s cellphone once at 11:08 a.m. and then the Racknine main number at 7:11 p.m.
Andrew Prescott, a volunteer with the Burke campaign, used Racknine to send out calls warning supporters about fake Election Canada messages.
Though he used Racknine to make these calls, there is no indication Prescott was involved in the original mischief.
“I was not involved in the illegal phone calls. I am a legitimate user of Racknine’s services, and have been for several years,” he said in an email. “I am a devoted believer in free and fair elections. I would never partake in ANY illegal activities, and openly advocate for everyone to play by the rules.”
Meier confirmed Prescott’s story and said he is satisfied Prescott was not involved in the fake Elections Canada calls.
Reached Wednesday, Burke referred calls about the matter to Michael Sona, who was his director of communications during the campaign and now works for Conservative MP Eve Adams. Sona did not respond to a series of questions about the matter.
Sona made headlines during the Guelph campaign when he was accused of trying to shut down a special ballot on the University of Guelph campus. Witnesses said he tried to grab a ballot box, arguing that the voting process was illegal.
Hamilton later sent a letter to Elections Canada asking that the votes in that box be ruled invalid. Elections Canada allowed them to be counted.
Despite the dirty tricks phone calls, Valeriote won the election in Guelph and increased his margin of victory over 2008, to more than 6,000 votes.
Two weeks after the election, Mathews came to Guelph and interviewed Campbell at his suite in the Holiday Inn, recording her statement and taking careful notes. She said she understood he was also speaking to others in Guelph who had received the calls.
If Mathews and the Commissioner of Canada Elections find evidence of wrongdoing over the bogus Elections Canada calls, the case could be referred to Director of Public Prosecutions Brian Saunders, who would decide whether to lay charges.
That’s the same route followed when Elections Canada discovered attempts by the Conservatives to evade the spending cap on the 2006 campaign by purchasing advertising funded through a series of coordinated wire transfers into and out of candidate accounts. The party pleaded guilty to Election Act breaches last year." - National Post.

Friday, February 17, 2012

Is Justin Trudeau immature and narcissistic, or just passionate and not afraid to show it?


"OTTAWA — Justin Trudeau betrays his political immaturity and narcissism in suggesting that his commitment to a united Canada is dependent on whether the Conservative government validates his personal values, say prominent political analysts.
"This guy is clearly self-indulgent; he really does think everything is about him and his feelings," Barry Cooper, a political theorist at the University of Calgary, said Tuesday in commenting on statements Trudeau made in a recent French-language interview. "That's a measure of his lightweight status in the firmament of deep-thinking Liberals."
On Sunday, Trudeau, a Montreal MP, told his Radio-Canada host: "I always say, if at a certain point, I believe that Canada was really the Canada of Stephen Harper — that we were going against abortion, and we were going against gay marriage, and we were going backwards in 10,000 different ways — maybe I would think about making Quebec a country."
The remarks have generated a furor this week. The blogosphere and the twitterverse went into hyperdrive, with commentators stunned that the 40-year-old son of Pierre Trudeau could so readily offend his father's federalist vision. The politicians weren't far behind. Not surprisingly, the Bloc Quebecois interpreted Trudeau's remarks as an endorsement for their own opposition to the Conservative government.
A Tory MP, Merv Tweed, taunted Trudeau, saying "while our Conservative government is committed to keeping Canada strong, united and free, the member opposite is contemplating reasons for Quebec to separate from Canada.''
Such remarks forced to Trudeau to beat a hasty retreat on Tuesday, clearing the air with a three-minute address in front of a mob of reporters and cameras on Parliament Hill. "The question is not why does Justin Trudeau suddenly not love this country, because the question is ridiculous,'' Trudeau said. "I live this country in my bones every breath I take, and I'm not going to stand here and somehow defend that I actually do love Canada because we know I love Canada.''
Regardless of Trudeau's rhetorical retrenchment, some observers said his original remarks revealed a great deal about his character, as well as his incoherence as a politician.
"If had read the quote and not known who said it, I would have attributed it to an adolescent," said Tom Darby, a political philosopher at Carleton University in Ottawa. "It does not matter what party or even what policies one favours, the quote is factually untrue, irresponsible, and even treasonous. He (Trudeau) says that his father was an intellectual and that he is not. About this he is correct, which his childish statement proves."
Robert Asselin, a political scientist at the University of Ottawa who specializes in Canada-Quebec affairs, noted the inherent narcissism of Trudeau's attitude. "That's the first observation I would make. But also, government policy should not dictate one's preference for secession or not. Secession is a very grave action and you don't even suggest it (as a possibility) because you don't share certain beliefs or values of the government of the moment."
"Politics is not about personal feelings," said Cooper. "It's about the ethics of responsibility. He was elected as a member of Parliament from a particular constituency. He was not elected in his own right because he has these sensitive feelings about various things. Whether he likes it or not, he's supposed to be a responsible political leader, and he's clearly incapable of understanding what his job is."
Trudeau has, in fact, been stepping in it regularly of late. In December, he referred to Environment Minister Peter Kent as a "piece of sh--." He was taken to task for wrongly claiming that there would be no way to track firearms after the registry's disappearance when he tweeted his opposition to the Conservative government's plans to scrap the gun registry. And he was much criticized when he told a reporter he was "uncomfortable" with the use of the phrase "honour killings" because he thought it was "pejorative."
Political analysts such as Darby and Cooper question whether Trudeau has taken his dislike of Harper's policies to an imprudent extreme that says more about himself than about the policies he supposedly opposes.
"Young Trudeau is living out the consequences of his father's vision of what the country should look like, that the state exists to compel us to like one another, to think alike, that we all have to have the same values," said Cooper. "You've got this kind of narcissistic response that the state only exists to reflect your values. There's nothing to be patriotic about (and) so you can indulge whatever idiosyncratic policy preferences you might have. Trudeau Junior reflects this attitude, and for a lot of people his age and younger, they probably think this is a perfectly legitimate way of looking at politics."
Trudeau's statement reflected the "incredible notion" that loyalty to one's country is predicated on whether that country lived up to your personal sentiments, said Darby. It is quite legitimate to oppose the policies of a particular government, he said, but Trudeau showed no sense of what Canadians have in common, no sense of shared citizenship and the responsibilities that come with citizenship. "The problem with that is he's not thinking beyond his own self-interest. He's like a kid who says, 'I don't like what's happening in this game, so I'm going to take my stuff and go home.'"
Asselin, meanwhile, speculated that Trudeau reflected the sentiments of many Quebecers who feel they don't share the values of the Conservative government. Nevertheless, that's no excuse to indulge in imprudent hints about supporting separatism. "That's the line he crossed. That's why it's dangerous."
Trudeau's behaviour raises questions about his political intelligence, and his potential as a future Liberal leader, Asselin said. "I'm always surprised to see his name as a potential candidate (for the Liberal leadership) because I've never seen anything substantive from him that would make me believe he would be a good leader. What is his vision of Canada? I would not be able to tell you what it is. I know what his father stood for, but I don't know what Justin Trudeau's is."
And what might Pierre Trudeau have thought of his son's statement? "I don't think his father would have been happy at all to read it. He would probably spank him on his behind, and say, 'What have you said? This is not right.'" " - ROBERT SIBLEY, POSTMEDIA NEWS 

What do you think? Is Justin not mature enough as a politician? Or is he just passionate about his country?