Showing posts with label NDP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NDP. Show all posts

Thursday, February 23, 2012

'Charges must be laid': NDP outrage over allegations that illegal election ‘robocalls’ linked to Tories


"The NDP has demanded a criminal investigation into links between the Conservatives and an Edmonton voice-broadcast company traced to fraudulent phone calls made during the federal election campaign.
The misleading pre-recorded calls received in Guelph, Ont., claimed they were from Elections Canada and told voters their polling stations had moved to a busy shopping mall in the city’s downtown.
Elections Canada, which made the connection, is now probing the deceptive “robocalls,” aided by the RCMP, while the Conservatives are conducting an internal probe. A party lawyer is interviewing campaign workers to find who was behind the “robocalls.”
The agency launched its investigation after it was inundated with complaints about election day calls in Guelph, Ont., one of 18 ridings across the country where voters were targeted by harassing or deceptive phone messages in an apparent effort to discourage Liberal supporters from voting.
In Guelph, a riding the Conservatives hoped to take from the Liberals, voters received recorded calls pretending to be from Elections Canada, telling them their polling stations had been moved. The calls led to a chaotic scene at one polling station, and likely led some voters to give up on voting.
Postmedia News and the Ottawa Citizen have found that Elections Canada traced the calls to Racknine Inc., a small Edmonton call centre that worked for the party’s national campaign and those of at least nine Conservative candidates, including Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s own campaign in Calgary Southwest. There is no evidence that Harper’s campaign or any of the other candidates were involved in the calls.
Opposition MPs have expressed suspicion, saying the Tories benefited from what appears to be a coordinated effort to discourage Liberal or NDP supporters from getting to the ballot box.
Comparing the practice to “goons with clubs,” outspoken NDP MP Pat Martin called the phone calls a heinous crime and demanded that charges be laid.
“How is this different from a bunch of goons with clubs blocking the door to a voter station as we’ve seen in third world countries or the deep south of the United States? Because the net effect is the same,” the MP for Winnipeg Centre said.
Liberal MP John McCallum said his party doesn’t have a “smoking gun pointing at Stephen Harper” but he encouraged the Conservatives to co-operate with the investigation.
“I want them to indicate they are cooperating fully in the investigation by Elections Canada, that they are revealing all information they are required to reveal and that they are not going to take this to court,” McCallum said.
Transcript of a bogus call sent to a voter in Guelph on federal election day, May 2, 2011.
“This is an automated message from Elections Canada. Due to a projected increase in voter turnout, your poll location has been changed. Your new voting location is at the Old Quebec Street Mall, at 55 Wyndham Street North. Once again, your new poll location is at the Old Quebec Street Mall, at 55 Wyndham Street North. If you have any questions, please call our hotline at 1-800-443-4456. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. (French version recorded in another woman’s voice follows.)”
The Conservative party issued a statement Thursday denying it was behind the calls: “The Conservative Party of Canada ran a clean and ethical campaign and would never tolerate such activity,” said the statement attributed to Jenni Byrne, who managed the Tories’ national campaign.
“The party was not involved with these calls and if anyone on a local campaign was involved they will not play a role in a future campaign.”
The statement said the party does not engage in voter suppression. Although the statement makes no mention of this, Postmedia News has learned that the party’s lawyer, Arthur Hamilton, is conducting an internal investigation into the calls.
NDP interim leader Nycole Turmel issued a letter the party sent to Commissioner of Canada Elections William Corbett, asking him to investigate fully.
But an Elections Canada investigation has been underway since immediately after the May 2 vote.
Racknine says it was unaware its servers were being used for the fake calls.
Fred DeLorey, a spokesman for the Conservative Party, declined to say how much business the party did with Racknine during the campaign. He said the party does not know who was behind the calls, and he did not respond to a question about its internal investigation.
Elections Canada came to Racknine after an elaborate digital chase that began with a single telephone number that showed up on call displays. Investigators traced it to a disposable “burner” cellphone registered in area code 450, in the city of Joliette, northeast of Montreal.
Using telephone billing records and Racknine server logs, Elections Canada investigators identified the Racknine account holder who sent out the calls.
Matt Meier, owner of Racknine, said he was unaware one of his customers was involved in the calls until contacted by Elections Canada in November.
“We couldn’t possibly have known that it was Racknine that was the initiator of the fake calls,” he said. “I had no idea what the content of the calls were.”
The company does not monitor outgoing calls made by customers through the automated service, Meier said. He estimates 10 million or more phone calls from about 200 accounts went out during the campaign.
Meier and his company are co-operating fully with the probe, he said.
He said he knows whose account was used for the calls, but could not reveal the owner, because of client confidentiality and concerns about interfering with the investigation. He said it was someone “down East” — meaning Ontario or Quebec.
The RCMP’s role in the investigation is unclear but it appears the force is assisting Elections Canada. RCMP officers have approached the Conservative Party, according to a source familiar with the matter.
The robocalls received in Guelph were recorded in female voices in both French and English. They told voters their polling stations had moved to a shopping mall in the city’s downtown, where parking was scarce.
Citizen-Postmedia investigation has found calls misdirecting voters were also reported in ridings across the country: Kitchener-Waterloo, Kitchener-Conestaga, London-West, Parkdale-High Park, Winnipeg South Centre and Sydney-Victoria. It is possible that they were caused by robo-dialing errors.
Liberal supporters in a dozen ridings, mostly in Ontario, reported mysterious harassing calls, often late in the evening or early in the morning, where rude callers from a phone bank pretended to be working for the Liberals. The calls seem to have been an attempt to alienate Liberal voters in ridings where the Liberals and Conservatives seemed to be in close contests.
The continuing Elections Canada probe is led by former RCMP fraud investigator Al Mathews, who previously worked on investigations of former Privacy Commissioner George Radwanski and former prime minister Brian Mulroney in the Airbus affair.
The Conservatives’ internal investigation is being conducted by Arthur Hamilton, who has been the party’s lead lawyer for years, making representations to the Gomery Commission and investigating MP Helena Guergis and Rahim Jaffer for the party in the “busty hookers” saga.
Hamilton did not respond to a request for comment, but sources say he is interviewing people who worked on the Conservative campaign.
“It seems [investigators] have identified somebody who did it, knowingly,” said one Conservative who spoke on condition of anonymity.
In addition to Racknine’s work for Alberta Conservative candidates in the federal election, Meier also has been involved with the provincial Wildrose Party in Alberta. Racknine’s voice-broadcasting service, marketed as [external] 2call.ca, hosted a hospitality suite at the most recent Conservative convention in Ottawa in June.
Meier says the firm is non-partisan and is trying to help Elections Canada.
“What I provided to Elections Canada was comprehensive,” he said in an interview this week. “They know everything. They have every single message recorded by the individuals who did this. That’s something I hope will assist them greatly in determining who made these calls.”
He realized his firm was linked to the deceptive calls only when Mathews showed up unannounced at his company’s office on 50th Street in Edmonton last November, armed with an order to produce records.
‘At first, I thought. “Oh, that’s strange,” Upon reflection, I thought, “This can’t be right. Why on Earth would it change on the day election?”’
— Sue Campbell, who had just returned home after voting on the morning of election day when a call came in saying her polling station had been moved
Elections Canada spokesman John Enright said the commissioner does not comment on ongoing investigations but confirmed an investigation into “some complaints regarding unsolicited telephone calls in which a violation of the (Elections) Act may have occurred.”
Mathews has travelled to Guelph to interview people who received the calls on election day, including United Church minister Sue Campbell, who is the wife of Green Party candidate John Lawson.
Campbell had just returned home after voting on the morning of election day when a call came in saying her polling station had been moved to the Quebec Street Mall in downtown Guelph.
“At first, I thought. ‘Oh, that’s strange,’” Campbell recalls. “Upon reflection, I thought, ‘This can’t be right. Why on Earth would it change on the day election?’”
She wrote down the digits on the caller ID — the number in Quebec — and called Elections Canada to complain.
Internal Elections Canada emails obtained under Access to Information legislation show officials were rattled by the calls.
At 11:06 a.m., election officer Anita Hawdur sent an email to to legal counsel Karen McNeil with the header: “URGENT Conservative campaign office communications with electors.” Hawdur reported that returning officers were calling to ask about the calls. McNeil responded by asking Hawdur to alert Rennie Molnar, the deputy chief electoral officer. He later emailed Michel Roussel, a senior director: “This one is far more serious. They have actually disrupted the voting process.”
Around the same time, Guelph Liberal MP Frank Valeriote got a call at his home, telling him that his campaign staff was hearing from Liberal supporters in the riding about the same kind of bogus Elections Canada calls.
What they first thought were a few nuisance calls, the Valeriote campaign recognized was an orchestrated campaign to discourage his supporters from voting.
Voters who ended up in the wrong place and were turned away were unlikely to persist and go to another polling station. A campaign worker was quickly dispatched to the mall, armed with a binder of polling maps, so he could redirect supporters back to the right place. Within an hour, more than 100 voters had turned up at the mall.
The phoney calls also were causing headaches for campaign staff working for Conservative candidate Marty Burke’s campaign. Radio stations were passing on a warning from Elections Canada about the erroneous messages.
Long-distance phone bills obtained by the Citizen and Postmedia show that the Guelph campaign called Matt Meier’s cellphone once at 11:08 a.m. and then the Racknine main number at 7:11 p.m.
Andrew Prescott, a volunteer with the Burke campaign, used Racknine to send out calls warning supporters about fake Election Canada messages.
Though he used Racknine to make these calls, there is no indication Prescott was involved in the original mischief.
“I was not involved in the illegal phone calls. I am a legitimate user of Racknine’s services, and have been for several years,” he said in an email. “I am a devoted believer in free and fair elections. I would never partake in ANY illegal activities, and openly advocate for everyone to play by the rules.”
Meier confirmed Prescott’s story and said he is satisfied Prescott was not involved in the fake Elections Canada calls.
Reached Wednesday, Burke referred calls about the matter to Michael Sona, who was his director of communications during the campaign and now works for Conservative MP Eve Adams. Sona did not respond to a series of questions about the matter.
Sona made headlines during the Guelph campaign when he was accused of trying to shut down a special ballot on the University of Guelph campus. Witnesses said he tried to grab a ballot box, arguing that the voting process was illegal.
Hamilton later sent a letter to Elections Canada asking that the votes in that box be ruled invalid. Elections Canada allowed them to be counted.
Despite the dirty tricks phone calls, Valeriote won the election in Guelph and increased his margin of victory over 2008, to more than 6,000 votes.
Two weeks after the election, Mathews came to Guelph and interviewed Campbell at his suite in the Holiday Inn, recording her statement and taking careful notes. She said she understood he was also speaking to others in Guelph who had received the calls.
If Mathews and the Commissioner of Canada Elections find evidence of wrongdoing over the bogus Elections Canada calls, the case could be referred to Director of Public Prosecutions Brian Saunders, who would decide whether to lay charges.
That’s the same route followed when Elections Canada discovered attempts by the Conservatives to evade the spending cap on the 2006 campaign by purchasing advertising funded through a series of coordinated wire transfers into and out of candidate accounts. The party pleaded guilty to Election Act breaches last year." - National Post.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Pundits agree: First NDP leadership debate lacks a little... Jack.

Source: The Star.


"Once again, unanimity breaks out among the Ottawa punditerati. This time it relates to the first big debate in the NDP leadership race. Journalists covering the debate agree that they disagree on who did what.

Lawrence Martin at the Globe says the debate went to Thomas Mulciar, the Quebec candidate, and Niki Ashton, “the kid candidate.” Mulcair “came across as seasoned, articulate, very much at ease. There were no flashes of his reputed blowtorch temper. More so than the others, he had the presence of a leader.” As for Ashton: “Ottawa politics is so youth-deficient that it was a treat to see the zest and command of this 29 year-old multilingual Manitoban. She’s calling for a new politics. If her age and spontaneity helps get her generation involved in the process, she will have made progress toward her goal, striking a blow against the stale thinking of aging baby boomers.”

Hmm. [National Post's] own John [...] begs to differ somewhat. He agrees Mr. Mulcair was “the epitome of collegiality and good humour” (which is significant because his temper is generally portrayed as just this side of an erupting volcano), but doesn’t think he has much hope outside Quebec. Ms. Ashton is lumped in with the also-rans, while corporate Canada is warned to watch out for Peggy Nash: ” Ms. Nash claims that the countries that have truly succeeded “haven’t handed over all decision-making power to corporations. By the sound of her plan, under a Nash government those decisions would be made by the unions, which she considers to be an extension of the party, and the government. Ms. Nash put in a solid performance and nobody should be at all surprised if she ends up winning next March.”
Barbara Yaffe of the Vancouver Sun of the Vancouver Sun thought no one was very impressive. She thinks Ashton “looked too pixie to be going for a top political job” and the candidates spent too much time agreeing with one another to create “distinctive storylines” that might make them stand out. The most intriguing moment, she thought, was when the candidates were asked who they support besides themselves. Topp and Nash both picked Ashton, probably because they figure she can’t win and are keen to gather in her supporters.
The Star's Tim Harper , like several others, thought B.C. MP Nathan Cullen outperformed expectations and that former party strategist Brian Topp “delivered perhaps the most succinct, substantive and thought-provoking answers of the afternoon, and showed an aggressive streak when he unexpectedly went after Paul Dewar over the Ottawa Centre MP’s economic plan.”
(Ivision says Topp probably went after Dewar because he has data showing Dewar is beating him, which “suggests the received wisdom that he is in the lead is wrong, as usual.”)
Rabble.ca, the left-wing site most likely to be NDP-friendly, thought the contenders “limped out of the starting gate.”
“From the dire situation in Attawapiskat to the manufacturing sector and green collar jobs — the candidates agreed, agreed and agreed again.” Mulcair “largely flew under the radar,” while Nash “largely stuck to rhetoric”. Ashton was interesting, but also prone to rhetoric and armed with something called “new Politics” which “had a few people scratching their heads.”
So, Mulcair was either a clear winner, or a non-event; Nash was heavy on rhetoric but could be a surprise; Ashton was a breath of fresh air or an also-ran who’s too much of a pixie to be taken seriously; and Dewar might be doing way better than anyone knows. The one thing everyone agreed on was that Nova Scotia’s Robert Chisholm was an embarrassment, who couldn’t speak French and looked silly pledging to learn it ASAP. (Anyone mention the Orange Crush, Robert? It happened in Quebec. Where they speak French.)" - Kelly McParland, National Post. 

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

"I'll show you mine if you show me yours": NDP want to see Harper's Office Staff salaries and expenses

"The New Democrats are countering a request by a Conservative MP to see the salaries of top CBC on-air personalities by asking for the same level of disclosure of pay for senior staff in the Prime Minister’s Office, including chief of staff Nigel Wright and communications director Angelo Persichilli.
Conservative Brent Rathgeber last week tabled an order paper question calling on the public broadcaster to reveal how much it pays anchor Peter Mansbridge and comedian Rick Mercer, as well as produce a list of all CBC staff making more than $100,000 annually. The CBC might have an out via the Broadcast Act and it is uncertain whether it will be required to comply with the request.
But it’s hard to see how the Prime Minister’s Office can dodge the NDP’s request to produce the salaries and benefits paid to, among others, former directors of communications Dimitri Soudas, now with the Canadian Olympic Committee, and Kory Teneycke, who now helps run Sun News Network.  The request also asks for hospitality and travel expenses.
The employees named are “exempt staff,” whose salaries are supposed to be pegged to the pay ranges for equivalent positions in the public service. Where exactly they land in those ranges is not known.
In one of three order paper questions tabled Monday byMP Tyrone Benskin , the NDP asks for:
Mr. Benskin (Jeanne-Le Ber) – With Regard to the Prime Minister’s Office and its current and former employment of Bruce Carson, Dimitri Soudas, Sandra Buckler, Guy Giorno, Nigel Wright, Ian Brodie, Ray Novak, Andrew McDougall, Kory Teneycke, Alykhan Velshi and Angelo Persichilli: (a) what were/are the employment agreements with each of these individuals in terms of (i) salary, (ii) vehicle allowance or provision of car and/or driver, (iii) expense account for food, drink, alcohol and hospitality, (iv) out-of-town accommodations for the individual; (b) in each of the years between 2000 and 2011, how much did each of these individuals expense for (i) food, (ii) travel, (iii) hotels, (iv) hospitality, (v) drink, (vi) vehicle use; (c) what were the itemized amounts and descriptions of each individual’s individual expenses as identified in the answers to (b); and (d) if the PMO provides any of these individuals with a vehicle for his use, as identified in the answers to (a)(ii), broken down by individual, (i) what is the model and make of the car, (ii) how much does this benefit cost the PMO on an annual basis?
Just as Rathbeger asked for a list of CBC employees making more than $100,000 a year, the NDP is also calling for the same from PMO and other ministers’ offices.
And in language nearly identical to one of Rathbeger’s order paper questions for hospitality expenses from overseas CBC bureaus, the NDP wants the same accounting for PMO and other ministerial staff expenses claimed for hospitality, food, drinks, hotels and transportation in Rome, London, Washington, Paris and Boston.
The government will have 45 days to answer the questions." - Glenn McGregor, The Ottawa Citizen. 

Monday, June 27, 2011

Just because you have a majority, does not mean you can do whatever the Hell you want.


Brian Gable, The Globe and Mail

"Canadians aren't used to parliamentary government, in large part because we aren't used to federal politics built around real differences between our major parties over real issues. Instead, we are used to two conservative parties squabbling over mutual (often accurate) accusations of corruption, and over symbolic issues – most with little meaning to the daily lives of citizens.
Canadians have therefore long tuned out federal politics between elections. But that all changed on May 2nd.
We now have some real choices on offer in federal politics, and real debate over real issues. Like, for example, whether or not people have the right to withhold their labour if they don't like the pay they're being offered by their bosses.
The Conservative government is clear on where it stands. Faced with the situation at Canada Post (negotiations over pay and benefits broke down; the employer made a final offer which was not accepted; employees began to pressure the employer; and the employer then locked the employees out of work), the government has intervened with a bill that would order the employees, by law, to accept a worse deal than Canada Post proposed in its final offer.
Consider how that would play out in your own daily life. You're at work and renegotiating your salary. Your employer offers you, say, $50,000 a year. You don't accept this proposal – you feel you're worth $52,000. So your employer kicks you out of the office and tells you you'll stay out until you accept $50,000. And then Stephen Harper steps in and threatens you with fines or jail if you don't agree to return to work for, say, $48,000 – less than your boss offered you.
That's what's happening at Canada Post. Before May 2, there would have been relatively little debate on Mr. Harper's intervention, since the Conservatives found a like-minded partner in the former Liberal opposition.
But there's a new sheriff in town – a new, more numerous and more determined New Democrat Official Opposition with some important tools available to it to shine on light on issues like this. A majority government is in place, and it can ultimately get what it wants. But a real opposition, fighting on a real issue, can make things go very slowly indeed – so that Canadians can judge the issues, and see what Mr. Harper's government is doing in the bright light of day.
In short, we finally have an Official Opposition capable of, and willing to, do its job.
In a panel discussion about this matter a couple of days ago, a Conservative friend suggested that the current debate in Parliament shows the New Democrats have some “growing up to do.” In fact it is the Conservatives who have some growing up to do. They need to learn that having power is not a license to abuse it. And that the people of Canada elected 308 MPs, including a muscular Official Opposition that will work, within the rules of our democracy and long into the night, to shine a light on misjudgments and misgovernment." - Briann Topp, The Globe and Mail.

The afore-mentioned Post Canada Strike incident just shows just how low our democracy is about to sink now that Harper finally got the majority he has always wanted. There is more to come over the next four years. Brace yourself, Canada. Good luck to you all.

Friday, May 13, 2011